CURRENTS AND ADJUDICATIONS
Out of the great cultural and religious currents of the world, all kinds of sub-currents, sects and divisions have formed. It is a delicate and difficult subject to handle, as there is a latent anxiety in people to affiliate with them or, at least, to identify knowledge of one of these currents.
Out of the great cultural and religious currents of the world, all kinds of sub-currents, sects and divisions have formed. It is a delicate and difficult subject to handle, as there is a latent anxiety in people to affiliate with them or, at least, to identify knowledge of one of these currents.
From the great cultural and religious currents of the world, all kinds of sub-currents, sects and divisions have been formed. It is a delicate and difficult subject to handle, because there is a latent anxiety in people to join them or, at least, to identify the knowledge of some of these currents.
It is unfortunate, but, as humanity, we tend to attribute knowledge to certain people or groups that adopt them as their own, as if they had invented them, but most doctrines have existed for thousands of years. We must understand that knowledge is universal, the wisdom of the soul is written in the code of each cell, everyone can access this information; it is simply that we do not remember how to do it. The human being is a perfect machine and has a complete and extremely complex manual.
The mind needs substrates and to belong or be affiliated to something else, since it is very difficult for it to abandon sectarianism and rely solely on self-development or personal research.
It is very common for us as people to enroll and pigeonhole others into certain currents or thoughts. For example, if someone talks about rinzay-zen, then it is assumed that he or she belongs to Japanese Zen currents. If one speaks of tantrism or kundalini yoga, it is considered that he or she must belong to one of the 200 currents of South India. The same happens if one speaks of the mental correction process of the Mayas: it is assumed that the person belongs to the sect of Castañeda or Don Juan. If someone talks about the magic of the Navajo or Cheyenne, they will think he is a merchant of objects and feathers in the United States.
These assumptions are present in many other cases:
If one speaks of the races that went before us and of the relation of alchemy to the wisdom of the soul, one would say that the person belongs to any of the thousand sects that were derived from the theosophical society.
If one names the noble truths, the eightfold path or something of tai-chi, one would think of him as a Buddhist.
If you talk about runes or menhirs, you would think of a new Celtic sect.
If you talk about aura fire and the christic concept of Tammuz, you would assume it must be Babylonian or belong to a sect derived from the ziggurats of Iraq.
If one speaks of baths, silver and energy, would it be assumed that he is a Muinane shaman?
We must understand that classifying a person or knowledge within a group is not enough. The universal knowledge of the soul is repeated in the same way in different languages and keys throughout time. All of the above is written in tradition and in the old codices of the most ancient cultures, it was not invented by someone in particular.
To understand this, we must follow the inner mission of research, love and personal evolution, and thus reach knowledge and enlightenment.
Copyright Hilda Strauss. All rights reserved ©